POLICY
RFK Jr.'s vaccine panel appointees raise ethics questions
The vaccine advisory panel appointed by HHS chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week was formed after the previous 17 members were dismissed over what he described as conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. However, the new slate of advisers is drawing scrutiny for their own conflicts of interest — as well as a lack of infectious disease expertise.
Several appointees, including Robert Malone and Martin Kulldorff, have served as paid expert witnesses in lawsuits against vaccines or publicly questioned vaccine safety, raising concerns among public health experts and ethicists about how conflicts are being defined.
“I don't know what conflict of interest vetting will look like with this administration,” Robert Besser, CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting CDC director, told STAT. He said asking questions about vaccine safety isn’t a conflict, but “when you have people who have not just asked those questions, but spread misinformation and disinformation, that should be a disqualifier.”
Read more.
GENETICS
Wojcicki's nonprofit wins 23andMe bidding war
23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki will acquire the bulk of the consumer genetic data company’s assets for $305 million via her nonprofit TTAM Research Institute. She outbid Regeneron in a final round of bidding designed to maximize value for shareholders. The move transitions the struggling company — which was once valued at more than $3.5 billion — into a nonprofit.
Concern has been swirling about the fate of 23andMe’s vast trove of genetic data, STAT’s Matthew Herper writes — but TTAM has pledged to uphold existing privacy policies, refrain from selling data, and form new identity protections.
“We believe it is critical that individuals are empowered to have chocie and transparency with respect to their genetic data and have the opportunity to continue to learn about their ancestry and health risks as they wish,” Wojcicki said in a statement.
Read more.
POLICY
Academics propose fix to research overhead crisis
Facing a backlash over the Trump administration’s 15% cap on research overhead — a move that could cost some universities more than $100 million annually — a coalition of academic groups has floated two alternative models aimed at preserving scientific funding while reducing bureaucratic pressures.
The Joint Associations Group, or JAG, proposes either tiered payments based on research type and institution — or a granular accounting system that turns indirect costs into line items in each grant proposal. Both models would replace the current complex system of negotiated rates with the hopes of boosting transparency, flexibility, and fairness, STAT’s Jonathan Wosen writes.
In a recent Senate hearing, it appears that lawmakers and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya were intrigued by this approach.
Read more.