relay icon

by Firefox Relay

0 email trackers removed

Upgrade for more protection

Green Daily
New disclosure rules |
Bloomberg

California is the first state to require sellers in high-risk areas to disclose what they’ve done to protect houses. Today’s newsletter looks at what buyers and sellers in the state should now expect. You can read and share the full version of this story on Bloomberg.com.

Plus, read the new warnings from S&P on reinsurer protections as natural catastrophes become more frequent and destructive. For unlimited access to climate and energy news, please subscribe

Older California homes come with fire warnings for buyers

By Todd Woody

Most California homes were built long before the state required that they be constructed to withstand wildfires. Now, sellers of older homes in high-risk areas must disclose to potential buyers not only a dwelling’s susceptibility to fire but what they’ve done to address those vulnerabilities.

As climate change intensifies natural disasters, states across the US have been mandating that home sellers disclose risks such as flooding. But the California disclosure is the first to zero in on a property’s ability to survive a catastrophe.

That could make the state a model as wildfire and other climate threats endanger homes across the US. While three dozen states require some degree of flood-risk disclosure, only California currently mandates home sellers reveal wildfire hazards. 

“When you require disclosure, you see effects on home prices,” said Margaret Walls, a senior fellow at Resources for the Future, a Washington, DC-based nonprofit research institute. 

Walls and other economists’ research has shown that disclosing climate risks results in lower home prices, but that buyers are willing to pay more for safer properties. That, in theory, should motivate sellers to improve their homes’ resilience to climate risks. 

A home destroyed by the Eaton Fire in Altadena, California, on Jan. 22. Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg

The new California rule requires sellers to list specific features that endanger a house, including combustible roofs, uncovered vents, single-pane windows and vegetation within five feet (1.5 meters) of a building. Real estate disclosures showing the seller has remedied such threats could help buyers when they apply for homeowners’ insurance, according to experts. 

Whether a sale goes through is increasingly contingent on a home’s insurability as insurance companies reduce their exposure in disaster-prone areas that are seeing more fires and floods. 

“Insurers in these very high hazard severity zones are going to ask homeowners to do all these things,” said Jennifer Valdez, a fire inspector for the Monterey Fire Department in California, where 40% of the city is subject to the wildfire disclosure rules. 

Seren Taylor, vice president of the Personal Insurance Federation of California, a lobbying group for the state’s major carriers, said that in high-risk areas, insurers will give preference to homes that have reduced wildfire threats. “The point of sale is clearly a terrific opportunity to start to get home hardening built into older housing stock,” he said. 

Do climate disclosures work?

What remains unknown is to what extent real estate disclosures compel sellers to preemptively improve wildfire resilience — or how much buyers are paying attention to the warnings amid a deluge of disclosures that accompany the sale of a house.  

“You can give people too much information such that they ignore all of it,” said Matthew Kahn, an economics professor at the University of Southern California.

A home burns during the Mountain Fire in Camarillo, California, in 2024. Photographer: Eric Thayer/Bloomberg

Kahn said further research is needed, but he sees California’s wildfire disclosures as potentially having a similar effect. “For those home sellers who can demonstrate that they've taken proactive steps to protect their homes, they're going to sell for a price premium,” he said. “Those homeowners who haven't taken these steps are going to sell their home for a lower price than they would've if they hadn't had to disclose this stuff.”

An analysis Walls co-authored published in the journal Land Economics determined that older homes in California sold for nearly 5% less when subject to a general wildfire disclosure.

California’s wildfire disclosures

California enacted a two-prong wildfire disclosure law in 2020 after a series of destructive conflagrations. The first part took effect in 2021 and requires home sellers in zones the state designated as having high and very high fire hazard to provide buyers with documentation that they’ve complied with restrictions on vegetation around a house that could ignite the structure, called defensible space.

The second provision — the new home hardening disclosure — went into force in July and applies to homes built before 2010.

Sellers appear to be complying with the requirements, according to Gov Hutchinson, assistant general counsel for the California Association of Realtors, a trade group. “It's another disclosure, it doesn't seem to interfere with sales,” he said. 

Home sellers will have more work to do in the coming years as the state begins enforcing regulations in 2029 that require owners of existing homes in high-risk wildfire areas to remove vegetation and other combustible material within five feet of the building. Some cities already require such ember-resistant zones. 

Read the full story to see how inspectors are handling pre-sale checks, why iconic towns like Carmel-by-the-Sea are affected and whether sellers are truly hardening their homes against wildfire risk. 

Wide impact

91%
This is the percentage of California homes that were built before 2010, and there are 2 million dwellings in high-risk wildfire areas. About 3% to 4% of single-family houses come on the market annually.

Taking action

"It's Russian roulette every fire season. How many bullets can we dodge?" 
Brent Blackaby,
A Berkeley City councilmember who represents a district in the Berkeley Hills
In the wake of the Los Angeles fires, Berkeley has moved quickly to require ember-resistant zones for high-risk homes.

S&P warns of reinsurer protections

By Gautam Naik

As natural catastrophes become more frequent and destructive, a key backstop intended to help cover losses has gotten harder to access.

The reinsurance industry, which exists to help primary insurers cope with losses when disaster hits, has taken significant steps to shield itself against the financial fallout of storms, floods and other severe weather events, according to S&P Global Ratings.

Over the past half decade, the top 19 global reinsurers have more than halved their exposure to insured catastrophe losses, and will likely continue to bear a smaller burden than they have historically, according to Simon Ashworth, chief analytical officer for insurance ratings at S&P.

“I don’t expect the pendulum to swing back anytime soon,” he said in an interview.

A military truck drives down a flooded Canal Street following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall in New Orleans on Aug. 31, 2005. Photographer: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

The industry has built considerable buffers after years of dodging losses and accumulating capital via investments. Big reinsurers now have enough capital to handle insured losses equivalent to three Hurricane Katrinas in a single year, or roughly $300 billion, while maintaining their existing credit ratings, according to S&P.

“That is remarkable,” Ashworth said.

This year, natural catastrophes are set to drive insured losses past $150 billion, which is well above the 10-year-average, according to risk modeler Verisk. With primary insurers struggling under the weight of the costs they now face, reinsurers are under mounting pressure to lower their prices and expand their coverage.

S&P sees a “moderate decline in rates” from reinsurers that Ashworth says “will help alleviate some of the pressure on primary insurers.” But overall, the industry looks set to “hold firm on terms and conditions,” he said.

Read the full story on Bloomberg.com. 

More from Green

Europe’s rapidly warming climate is giving Chinese air conditioner manufacturers a new growth market, helping offset lost sales to the US amid trade disputes.

Exports of air conditioners to the European Union and UK rose 16% to 7.9 million units in the first seven months of this year, compared with the same period in 2024, according to data from Chinese customs. Gree Electric Appliances Inc of Zhuhai and Haier Smart Home Co. Ltd. are among the Chinese manufacturers that have seen sales in Europe this year skyrocket, local media reported earlier this summer.

Shipments of AC units from China to the US plunged 23% over the same comparative time, as a tariff war between the world’s two biggest economies disrupted trade flows.

This year Europe has suffered through successive heat waves, while the UK’s Met Office has said this summer was “almost certainly” Britain’s hottest on record. Many parts of Europe that once saw air conditioning as an American excess or only a Mediterranean necessity are beginning to embrace the idea of on-demand cooling for homes and businesses amid a new climate reality on the world’s fastest warming continent.

Read the full story on Bloomberg.com 

A public temperature display reading +39 degrees centigrade during high temperatures in Madrid on June 20, 2025. Photographer: Claudia Paparelli/Bloomberg

Hong Kong's financial secretary slammed the US’s pullback from environment-friendly policies, citing the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and shift back to fossil fuels as disappointing.

BlackRock Inc. is exploring ways to derisk new offerings within blended finance, as the world’s largest money manager tries to make products intended to speed the energy transition more palatable for private clients.

Danish startup Rock Flour Co. raised funds from investors including the main owner of Novo Nordisk A/S for a project to use Greenlandic glacier rock powder to store carbon dioxide.

Worth a listen

On the latest episode of Zero, we hear from you. Bloomberg Green’s Akshat Rathi answers questions from listeners. 

Is Donald Trump a climate warrior in disguise? How do we tell if corporations are greenwashing or not? And are we about to enter a new era of collaboration when it comes to green tech?

If you have a burning question for the show that you’d like Akshat and the Bloomberg Green team to answer, send us a voice note or message to zeropod@bloomberg.net

Listen now, and subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or YouTube to get new episodes of Zero every Thursday.

US President Donald Trump Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/CNP

More from Bloomberg

  • Business of Food for a weekly look at how the world feeds itself in a changing economy and climate, from farming to supply chains to consumer trends
  • Hyperdrive for expert insight into the future of cars
  • Energy Daily for a daily guide to the energy and commodities markets that power the global economy
  • CityLab Daily for top stories, ideas and solutions, from cities around the world
  • Tech In Depth for analysis and scoops about the business of technology

Explore all Bloomberg newsletters.

Follow Us

Like getting this newsletter?