This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, an emotional consumption play of Bloomberg Opinion’s opinions. Sign up here.

• What’s up with  China’s Croc craze?
• Barbie’s in a trade war haze.
• Cockroaches!? Not at at Barclays.
• Trump’s ballroom deserves no praise.

We’re still nine days away from Oct. 31, but Spirit Halloween has already pivoted to gingerbread mode with its spinoff — Spirit Christmas — which, yes, you can actually shop at right now.

At first, it’s like: pick a lane!!!! Spirit can’t be hawking the Grim Reaper and Ebenezer Scrooge at the same time. But then again … maybe it can? At this point, I’m thinking we should just combine Halloween and Christmas. The logistics are all there. We could call it Hallomas or Chrisoween and Hallmark could run festive specials for months on end — a thing it already does, but it would be less weird this way. And we could normalize writing wishlists in October.

Here, I’ll start with my very own Chrisoween List:

1. One pair of fuzzy Crocs. [1]
2. The Stevie Nicks Barbie doll.
3. Two Labubus. (You can’t have one — they need friends.)

Now, you may be wondering: Jessica, you have the taste of a TikTok-pilled 12-year-old, what is going on? To which I say: Maybe I fudged my list! Maybe Bloomberg Opinion just so happened to publish three columns today — one about Crocs, another about Barbies and a third on Labubu. Would that be so bad?

Let’s start with the shoes. Juliana Liu says Crocs have become “the surprising shoe of choice for Chinese hipsters.” In recent months, Gen Zers have been filling their online shopping carts with the goofy plastic clogs, and sales in China are up 30% in the most recent quarter. “Crocs is one of the few American companies in that mix as an emotional consumption play,” she writes. “That’s unusual in a country feuding nearly daily with Washington over tariffs and where consumers are increasingly seeking cultural authenticity in the things they buy.”

Which brings us to Barbie. Unlike Crocs, Mattel is feeling the tariff whiplash. Sales are down, shares are slipping and Andrea Felsted says retailers are delaying holiday orders amid the trade war uncertainty. “Toys, which light up children’s holiday, are one of the goods most exposed to higher import costs, as the majority of supply comes from China,” she writes.

Is Pop Mart, the manufacturer behind Labubu, faring any better? For now, yes, but Shuli Ren sees cracks forming in its quirky facade. Shares are down 25% from an August peak, and some worry that the toymaker created a one-trick pony. “Can it come up with another product as viral as the toothy Labubu?” she asks. And, “if Labubu is the only intellectual property that can turbocharge growth, does it have lasting power with consumers?” This chart suggests no:

You might see a lot of Labubu costumes this Halloween, but by the time Christmas rolls around, who knows. Maybe those little monsters won’t be under the tree after all.

Here’s a horrific story about a young woman in South Korea who thought it’d be a good idea to use an “an improvised flamethrower” to kill a cockroach. She ended up setting her apartment on fire and inadvertently killed her neighbor — a mother of a two-month-old baby — who failed to escape the fifth-floor blaze.

I — and my landlord, surely — much prefer the pacifist’s method of critter abatement. You know, the one where you lie down next to the roach and sing it a sweet lullaby so that it can go gently into the night. It’s a shame that Jamie Dimon seems too skittish to partake in such activities — it sounds like he has a real problem:

Perhaps you’ve heard JPMorgan’s CEO warn about an incoming infestation: “When you see one cockroach, there are probably more,” he told investors on a call recently. But his talk of cockroaches was merely a metaphor for a different kind of creepy-crawly within the banking sector: auto-loan credit fraud. After the twin bankruptcies at Tricolor and First Brands, the financial world is on thin ice. Well, save for Barclays. (Paul J. Davies says the CEO doesn’t fancy himself an entomologist.)

As concerns mount around regional banks, Robert Burgess wonders: “Are more Tricolors lurking, and can they be stopped before inflicting pain on vulnerable households, the banking system and the economy? We may not know before it’s too late,” he writes. Still, Robert says it’d be a mistake for the Trump administration to nix the CDFI program, which allowed Tricolor to inject credit into underserved areas. “Rather than gut a program that is clearly helping the financially disadvantaged at a time when inequality has never been greater, it’s better to make sure it has an adequate and properly trained staff to detect and address problems before it’s too late,” he argues.

With more precautionary measures in place, maybe Dimon won’t need to call the exterminator at all.

Here’s a near-universal truth from Rosa Prince: “Too often … privilege has a corrosive effect on the person who possesses it.” She was talking about Prince Andrew, whose name surfaces in Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir accounting her abuse under Jeffrey Epstein.

But privilege can have a corrosive effect on all sorts of leaders, not just those with royal blood.

Consider Africa’s upper echelons. Justice Malala says “an inordinate number” of heads of state and elites are “medical tourists” who receive world-class treatments in private overseas hospitals with resources ordinary citizens could only dream of. Kenya’s opposition leader Raila Odinga died of heart failure in India. Nigeria’s former president, Muhammadu Buhari, took his last breath in London. Zimbabwe’s kleptocratic president Robert Mugabe perished in Singapore. The list goes on.

“So long as Africa’s political leaders and elites are able to enjoy foreign healthcare, they’re unlikely to tackle the shortcomings of their domestic institutions, including acute shortages of health workers, crumbling infrastructure and inadequate financing. They should be barred from seeking treatment overseas,” Justice writes.

Which brings us, improbably, to President Donald Trump’s latest show of privilege: a $250 million East Wing ballroom. Although the home improvement project is a minor transgression next to medical neglect and the Prince Andrew scandal, it’s still a telling one. “The White House is supposed to be the ‘The People’s House,’ not a palace — special, yet accessible,” Nia-Malika Henderson notes. “Trump, of gold-plated toilets and nouveau riche tchotchkes, has other ideas.” Gold may not corrode, but privilege is a different story.

My list of pros and cons for American Airlines is rather lopsided. On the “pro” side, there’s a single bullet point, which is that it will take you from Point A to Point B, the bare minimum requirement for an airline. On the “con” side, there’s a laundry list of grievances about lukewarm ginger ale, unusable restrooms, lost luggage, scheduling issues, phantom cockpit intruders and — perhaps the worst offense of them all — no seatback screens. Thomas Black explains how the airline decided years ago that those little TVs were an unnecessary expense on domestic flights because most passengers have cellphones and tablets. But the lack of the in-flight amenity is backfiring, he argues: “American, which has the same hub-and-spoke structure as Delta and United, is getting left out of the post-Covid premium flying bonanza.”

A new study is giving Mark Gongloff hope about the planet’s future: “All US cities combined, representing 93% of the US population, have a meat-related carbon footprint — the official scientific term for which is, sigh, ‘carbon hoofprint’ — of 329 million tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent per year. That is more than the UK’s annual carbon emissions through fossil fuels,” he writes. What’s hopeful about that? Well, Mark says it means that if we tweak our meat-eating habits ever so slightly — say, occasionally choosing the pork over the porterhouse — we could substantially reduce emissions without doing anything drastic like banning cheeseburgers. Not only would the change help save the climate, it’d do your wallet a solid, too. Steak is $$$ these days! Trump wants his beloved cattle ranchers to change that, but there’s a much easier way to lower prices that doesn’t involve presidential intimidation: just eat a little less beef!

France’s crisis isn’t just Macron’s problem — it’s Europe’s. — Bloomberg editorial board

GM’s Tesla-esque surge is a TACO trade in disguise. — Liam Denning

Can America afford to reopen the government? The welfare state offers a clue. — Allison Schrager 

Gold’s sudden price drop isn’t the kiss of death for an extraordinary run. — John Authers

OpenAI will find it hard to convince Chrome users to switch to a new “vibe lifting” browser. — Dave Lee

The pardon of George Santos signals peak whataboutism for Washington. — David M. Drucker

Is 4% a high interest rate? That depends on how you look at it. — Bill Dudley

Netflix is getting squeezed.

Disasters are money machines.

Reddit is suing Perplexity.

Supertalls are bad! Let’s build another.