Green Daily
The tracking program the industry needs |
View in browser
Bloomberg

The Trump administration has proposed a number of rollbacks to environmental laws, many of which the fossil fuel industry has asked for. But there’s one proposal oil and gas companies are less than excited about.

Today’s newsletter looks at why Big Oil wants to preserve a pollution reporting program the industry relies on to claim tax credits. Plus, we look at a push to stop economic activity in the rapidly melting Arctic and calls for NATO to invest in clean fuel. 

Save the data

By Zahra Hirji and Ruth Liao

The Environmental Protection Agency says its proposal to stop greenhouse gas reporting for big polluters could save oil and gas companies up to $256 million a year. Some of them are countering that it could hurt their business instead.

Companies, industry trade groups and other energy experts warn that axing the more than decade-old Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program could immediately jeopardize oil and gas firms’ ability to claim highly valued tax credits. It could also hurt companies selling liquefied natural gas, or LNG, to Asia and Europe in the future, they say, where less carbon-intensive energy sources are increasingly more desirable.

Halting emissions reporting introduces “significant uncertainty for producers” and “unnecessary complexity into programs that are critical for deploying the very solutions needed to meet energy and climate goals,” said Dustin Meyer, a senior vice president at the American Petroleum Institute, in public testimony at an EPA October hearing on the proposal.

API, which has nearly 600 members including Chevron Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corp., is a major industry group pushing to keep the program, which requires the nation’s biggest industrial polluters to calculate and report their annual greenhouse gas emissions every year. Exxon declined to comment on the proposal. Chevron, meanwhile, did not respond to requests for comment.

This reporting program “has no material impact on improving human health and the environment,” said an EPA spokesperson in an email, and killing it would allow companies more space to put their money on activities with “actual, tangible environmental impacts.”

The data it collects represents the the nation’s main record of large industrial emissions, which is publicly accessible online. It underpins US tax credits designed to incentivize capturing and storing carbon dioxide underground, rather than releasing it into the atmosphere where it contributes to global warming. It’s also used by states to track progress on their climate goals, by investors to inform decisions on energy ventures and by advocates to educate communities on nearby pollution sources.

EPA is proposing to stop requiring most sources to submit this data, and to suspend collecting it for certain oil and gas sources until 2034. Of the roughly 8,000 industrial facilities and suppliers nationwide required to report emissions now, nearly 2,300 of them were oil and gas operators. In 2023, they collectively recorded 322 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, according to the agency’s latest available data. That’s the same amount of pollution as produced by driving 75 million gasoline-powered vehicles for a year.

“Rolling back or delaying federal reporting 10 years would not reduce the burden — it would create regulatory whiplash when these rules come back,” said Lindsay Larrick, chief legal and administrative officer for natural gas producer BKV Corporation, in a public comment posted online Tuesday.

Taxpayers, meanwhile, wouldn’t be able to claim the carbon capture tax credit, known as 45Q, said Jessie Stolark, executive director of the Carbon Capture Coalition, a collaboration of companies, unions and environmental groups that includes Shell Plc and Occidental Petroleum Corp. In order to do so, companies must reference the volumes of stored CO2 reported to the EPA, she added.

“There will be ripple effects,” said former EPA official Jeff Cohen, who co-founded Xpansiv, a market platform for trading carbon credits and other environmental commodities. “This is a foundational reporting program that companies, banks, importers, exporters, local communities have been relying on for 15 years.”

Read the full story, including what other tax credits are at risk. To stay updated on the latest EPA rollback news, please subscribe to Bloomberg News.

    Call me maybe

    3,500
    The number of alerts issued by the UN’s International Methane Emissions Observatory since the program launched in 2022. In the past year, 12% of fossil fuel operators that received an alert took action.

    Flying blind

    "Cutting the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program blinds Americans to the facts about climate pollution."
    Joseph Goffman
    Former assistant administrator, EPA Office of Air and Radiation
    Advocates have also raised concerns that ending reporting will remove a key tool for the public to understand who the biggest emitters are and hold them to account.

    An Arctic reprieve

    By Danielle Bochove

    In a bid to slow the northern resource rush, the United Nations’ ocean advocate is calling for Arctic nations to spearhead creation of a new treaty that would halt economic activity in the central Arctic Ocean until the impact can be properly studied.

    Peter Thomson, the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for the Ocean, called for creation of a treaty at this year’s Arctic Circle Assembly in Reykjavik, Iceland. It would cover an area at the top of the planet roughly the size of the Mediterranean Sea. The treaty would apply to waters that lie beyond the Exclusive Economic Zone of each of the nations with Arctic coastline.

    Countries from the US and Russia to China have already begun scrambling to stake their claims in the Arctic. With ice-free summers likely in the next decade, activities like deep sea mining and shipping are only likely to increase, as is competition. That raises the risk of an ecological disaster in the fragile region.

    The US Coast Guard Icebreaker Healy on a research cruise in the Chukchi Sea. Photographer: Devin Powell/NOAA

    “I’m genuinely concerned that the activities of a single country, or company, could cause irreparable harm to the region before governance is in place to prevent it,” Thomson said. “Therefore a multilateral effort is needed to ensure new activities do not start without adequate research and an appropriate governance structure.”

    But multilateralism is under pressure — itself a running theme at the conference, which drew more than 2,000 participants from 70 countries. The world’s shipping regulator postponed a landmark charge on shipping emissions after facing US pressure last week. That decision, coupled with the recent collapse of UN talks for a plastics treaty, and diminishing hopes for next month’s climate talks in Brazil, are signs that global momentum for environmental initiatives is waning.

    In an interview after his address, though, Thomson said support for the treaty concept was “very positive” among the policymakers he approached at the conference for support. 

    He highlighted the Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries Agreement as a blueprint for success. That treaty, which bans signatories from commercial fishing in the region for 16 years, was ratified by all coastal Arctic and non-Arctic countries, including heavy-hitters like China and the EU.

    Pausing activity would allow researchers to study the environmental impacts and risks of economic development before global warming opens the region enough to make such activity possible, said Susanna Fuller, vice president of conservation and projects at Oceans North, a conservation group working with Thomson to support the treaty idea. 

    The High Seas Treaty, which has been ratified by more than 70 countries, comes into effect in a few months and is meant to protect ocean biodiversity. But because neither the US nor Russia has ratified it, it’s unlikely to lead to a Marine Protected Area in the central Arctic Ocean, Fuller said. A narrower solution led by Arctic nations that invites other countries to join would be easier to achieve, Oceans North believes.

    “We have an opportunity for precautionary forward thinking, which is so rare,” Fuller said.

    More from Green

    NATO members should boost their spending on renewable power and low-carbon energy to end their dependence on Russian oil and gas imports, according to a group of military veterans and defense experts.

    The European Union paid almost €22 billion ($25.5 billion) last year for fossil fuel imports from Russia, more than the €19 billion it gave Ukraine in financial support, the group said in a letter to European heads of government ahead of their meeting in Brussels on Thursday. The EU’s spending on Russian gas imports since February amounts to 75% of Russia’s military budget last year, they wrote.

    “While the EU has pledged to stop Russian oil and gas imports by the end of 2027, progress isn’t being made quickly enough,” the group said. “Whether imported from Russia or elsewhere, a reliance on fossil fuels makes our countries less secure.”

    Read the full story.

    Soldiers walk through the British Army’s first solar farm. Photographer: Ian Forsyth/Bloomberg

    The world’s biggest wealth fund is reviewing its bond portfolio to assess which issuers are most at risk from the fallout of extreme weather

    A marine heat wave off Florida in 2023 killed so many Acropora corals that two species are now “functionally extinct,” scientists have found.

    Washington diary

    The Arctic Wildlife Refuge is open for drilling, with a lease sale coming this winter, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. The Biden administration had put the pristine 1.56 million-acre stretch of tundra off limits. Many oil companies have been reluctant to target the area, given the high costs. Environmentalists and native Alaskans argue oil development in the region risks imperiling arctic foxes, polar bears and caribou.

    In more Trump and oil newsthe administration is taking advantage of low oil prices and buying 1 million barrels to start refilling the nation’s depleted emergency crude supply. The Energy Department announced Tuesday that it plans to buy oil for delivery in December and January, calling it “an important step in strengthening our energy security.”

    Trump slapped sanctions on Russian oil(Yes, there’s a theme today.) The US blacklisted Russian oil giants Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil PJSC in an effort to cut off revenue Russia needs for its war in Ukraine. The European Union also piled additional pressure on the Kremlin with a new package of sanctions targeting Russia’s energy infrastructure. In the wake of the sanctions, oil posted its biggest one-day gain in more than four months.

    The EU’s corporate greenhouse gas regulations are in the crosshairs of both the Trump administration and the Qatari government, according to Politico. The law, which went into effect last year but still needs to be adopted by EU members, requires companies doing business in the bloc identify and address their environmental impacts. In a letter, the Energy Department and Qatar expressed “deep concern” about the directive.

    More from Bloomberg

    • Business of Food for a weekly look at how the world feeds itself in a changing economy and climate, from farming to supply chains to consumer trends
    • Hyperdrive for expert insight into the future of cars
    • Energy Daily for a daily guide to the energy and commodities markets that power the global economy
    • CityLab Daily for top stories, ideas and solutions, from cities around the world
    • Tech In Depth for analysis and scoops about the business of technology

    Explore all Bloomberg newsletters.

    Follow Us

    Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.


    Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

    You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Green Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
    Unsubscribe
    Bloomberg.com
    Contact Us
    Bloomberg L.P.
    731 Lexington Avenue,
    New York, NY 10022
    Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices