January 22, 2026
john-wilkerson-avatar-teal
Washington Correspondent, D.C. Diagnosis Writer

If Deputy HHS Secretary Jim O’Neill and Assistant Secretary Alex Adams remind you of Bert and Ernie, you’re not alone. Send news tips and Muppet doppelgängers to John.Wilkerson@statnews.com or John_Wilkerson.07 on Signal.

congress

Resurrecting a health care deal

In Tuesday’s newsletter, I told you that lawmakers were “near” a health care deal. About half an hour after that newsletter hit your inbox, Congress released that deal as part of the HHS spending bill.

For months, lobbyists had been saying that the deal, struck originally in December of 2024, could come back up. Lawmakers had worked hard on it, and it was scuttled in large part because of an Elon Musk xeet-storm. Musk no longer has lawmakers’ ears, and the deal was low-hanging fruit at a time when politicians were having difficulties agreeing on much of anything.  

The health care measures in the deal range from PBM reforms to hospital billing transparency and measures to induce more pediatric cancer research.  

Anything can happen, but lobbyists say odds are that Congress will pass the HHS appropriations bill and avoid another government shutdown. 

The big snowstorm that is expected this weekend could complicate matters. The House is expected to vote on the bill this week, but senators might have a difficult time returning to town next week to vote if the storm is bad enough.

Read more on what’s in the bill, and see the next item for an explanation of one intriguing measure.


cancer screening

Holy Grail

The bill would allow Medicare to pay for blood tests that screen for multiple cancers. That’s potentially a big win for Grail, which sells just such a test, called Galleri.

Loads of lawmakers have backed efforts to make coverage of Galleri possible, but the potential cost has gotten in the way. Even if the law passes, the FDA would have to approve the test and Medicare would need to undertake a special process to determine whether to pay for it.

To deal with the cost problem, the bill includes a price cap, age restrictions, and a delay in the start of coverage to push most of the cost beyond Congress’ 10-year budget window. Medicare coverage would be phased in, starting in 2029 with aged 65 and younger, and increasing by one year of age each subsequent year. It also ties the pay rate to the price of a colon cancer screening test, which is about $500.



nih

NIH comes out on top

Congressional appropriators offered a near-total rebuke of the administration’s proposal to downsize and revamp the NIH, Anil Oza and Jonathan Wosen report

The spending bill would give the NIH $48.7 billion, a $415 million increase over the 2025 fiscal year, and it retains language meant to prevent the Trump administration from slashing support for research overhead. 

However, the bill includes a win for the White House. It continues to use a new funding strategy for multiyear grants that resulted in several thousand fewer awards for scientists in 2025. Read more.


global health

Stiffing WHO

The United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization, effective today, and the U.S. is not paying the approximately $278 million it owes the global health agency, Helen Branswell reports.

There’s not much the WHO can do about it, experts told Helen. Congress could settle up the bill, but Republicans, who control the House and Senate, have shown no interest in doing so. 

Read more about why the administration refuses to pay up.


insurance

Marathon testimony

Top executives of major health insurance companies like UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, and Cigna, are set to testify today at back-to-back hearings in the House. 

The theme for the hearings is health insurance affordability, similar to The Great Healthcare Plan that Trump released last week. Republicans are scrambling to regain control of the messaging on “affordability,” a term Democrats have employed to harness voter concerns about the cost of living heading into midterm elections. 

The Republican memo on the hearing covers a lot of ground, touching on sharply rising costs among insurers and health care providers, regulations, prior authorization, and vertical integration. 

Based on testimony submitted in advance, the executives are set to blame rising insurance costs on the high costs of hospital care, doctors, and drugs. They’ll tout efforts to improve preventive care and talk about the need for vague policies that provide “flexibility” and encourage “competition.” 


More around STAT
Check out more exclusive coverage with a STAT+ subscription
Read premium in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis with all of our STAT+ articles.

What we’re reading

  • Senior CDC official: Loss of measles elimination status in U.S. would be ‘cost of doing business’, STAT
  • Voters skeptical of RFK Jr.’s vaccine overhaul, The Wall Street Journal
  • Did my prostate cancer screening do more harm than good?, STAT
  • ICE is using Medicaid data to find out where immigrants live, Stateline

Thanks for reading! More next time,